<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verboten: &#8220;The Work&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrisashworth.org/blog/2008/02/05/verboten-the-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrisashworth.org/blog/2008/02/05/verboten-the-work/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:39:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wandering Nuckelavee</title>
		<link>http://chrisashworth.org/blog/2008/02/05/verboten-the-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2090</link>
		<dc:creator>Wandering Nuckelavee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 07:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisashworth.org/blog/2008/02/05/verboten-the-work/#comment-2090</guid>
		<description>I seem to recall an old chestnut about how you could can tell the hard sciences from all the rest because real, genuine disciplines of science don&#039;t have the word &#039;science&#039; in their names. (ie Physics &amp; Mathematics vs Social Sciences and Computer Science). Perhaps the same applies to things which are &#039;the work&#039; (art, drama, stagework) as opposed to things which simply are work (washing windows, assembling minivans, et al).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to recall an old chestnut about how you could can tell the hard sciences from all the rest because real, genuine disciplines of science don&#8217;t have the word &#8216;science&#8217; in their names. (ie Physics &amp; Mathematics vs Social Sciences and Computer Science). Perhaps the same applies to things which are &#8216;the work&#8217; (art, drama, stagework) as opposed to things which simply are work (washing windows, assembling minivans, et al).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://chrisashworth.org/blog/2008/02/05/verboten-the-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2017</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisashworth.org/blog/2008/02/05/verboten-the-work/#comment-2017</guid>
		<description>Well, see, that doesn&#039;t work.  Consider the following additional example:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Usually I find it terribly indulgent and artistically bankrupt, but in &lt;i&gt;this&lt;/i&gt;instance, I felt that choreographing the dancers to writhe indiscriminately on the floor while moaning was a bold statement.   I had to ask myself: &quot;Yes, we writhe.  But do we writhe in service to the work?&quot;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, see, that doesn&#8217;t work.  Consider the following additional example:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Usually I find it terribly indulgent and artistically bankrupt, but in <i>this</i>instance, I felt that choreographing the dancers to writhe indiscriminately on the floor while moaning was a bold statement.   I had to ask myself: &#8220;Yes, we writhe.  But do we writhe in service to the work?&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smadin</title>
		<link>http://chrisashworth.org/blog/2008/02/05/verboten-the-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2016</link>
		<dc:creator>smadin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisashworth.org/blog/2008/02/05/verboten-the-work/#comment-2016</guid>
		<description>Huh.  I guess the alternative would be calling it &quot;the play,&quot; and that just isn&#039;t &lt;em&gt;serious&lt;/em&gt; enough?  Geez, people, a &quot;play&quot; is what it &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh.  I guess the alternative would be calling it &#8220;the play,&#8221; and that just isn&#8217;t <em>serious</em> enough?  Geez, people, a &#8220;play&#8221; is what it <em>is</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://chrisashworth.org/blog/2008/02/05/verboten-the-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2015</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisashworth.org/blog/2008/02/05/verboten-the-work/#comment-2015</guid>
		<description>Also true!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also true!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://chrisashworth.org/blog/2008/02/05/verboten-the-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2014</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisashworth.org/blog/2008/02/05/verboten-the-work/#comment-2014</guid>
		<description>My issue with it has more to do with the idea of &quot;the work&quot; as a reverent phrase, as opposed to just &quot;work&quot;.  Romanticizing your work is an indirect way of lionizing yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My issue with it has more to do with the idea of &#8220;the work&#8221; as a reverent phrase, as opposed to just &#8220;work&#8221;.  Romanticizing your work is an indirect way of lionizing yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

