Hi! You appear to be using Internet Explorer. FYI, this site doesn't fully work with Internet Explorer.
Chrome, Safari, or Firefox are great alternatives to IE that do work.

My 2 Bucks on Pricing

If you read this blog with any regularity, you know I have two primary social circles: indie software and indie theater. I’m writing this with both of you in mind, but I’m going to start out with the theater kids and bend it back around. Software kids, sit tight for a second.

See, at the moment the world of indie theater is having a great big-ol’ chew-it-up hash-it-out discussion about the pros and cons and wherefores and howtos of dynamic pricing.

I find this fascinating, and entirely worthwhile. But, aside from believing some version of dynamic pricing is probably a great idea, I don’t have any direct experience using it. So: can’t really comment.

Thing is, the general topic of “pricing” is something I do have a little bit of experience with, and all this talk of dynamic pricing has been getting me hot and bothered about a related subject which has been festering on my blogging back burner for months.

Well, on Friday Dan Granata made a comment on Twitter that made the pot boil over. Dan wrote:

So it’s been a few days, but the comment re: my theatre, “Let’s be clear, tickets are $18, this isn’t Broadway” is a depressing datapoint.

I asked:

Wait, what? Someone was complaining about an $18 ticket being too expensive?

To which Dan replied:

No – they were saying *because* it was $18, they respected us less. Because we charge so little, we must not be worth much.

I tried to clarify:

Ah. Then: depressing because of all the work that goes in to it, and the quality that isn’t being respected?

And Dan explained:

sort of. More that someone who saw the show (and liked it) would still use ticket price as a indicator of quality.

And also that it supports my long-held fear that a low ticket price may actually hurt your reputation, rather than up sales

Which was, it turns out, the precise moment that

My Pot Boileth Over

First off, let’s just set a ground rule here: you know your customers better than I do. (Or at least I hope you do.) If I say something here that feels clearly stupid, and seems to suggest that you should do something that would offend or abuse or exploit your customers, then the rule is: your gut trumps my bloviation.

But I do want to humbly relate a few things I’ve learned in setting a price on my own hard work. It may be instructive. It may not. But at least hear me out, because the way I think about pricing now is very different from the way I thought about pricing at the start. I think it’s useful to know how, at least in my case, things that seemed obvious from the beginning weren’t always true.

Dear indie software friends, dear indie theater friends, this is a letter to you both, from four years in.

First, a few datapoints.

I make a product called QLab. There have been two version of QLab so far.

QLab version 1 had an audio license priced at $49. It had a video license priced at $149. It was very popular. It won a fancy award. It was so successful, in fact, that I quit my day job to work on it full time.

When I released QLab version 2, however, I changed the pricing. To wit:

  • QLab 2 has an audio license priced at $249.
  • QLab 2 has an educational discount for the audio license: $199.
  • QLab 2 has a new rental licensing scheme. It allows renting a license starting at $3/day, or $1/day for educational purposes.

The story I am telling today is about:

  • Why I decided to change the pricing,
  • What happened when I did, and
  • Whether or not I regret it.

While I don’t want to be overly prescriptive here, I have enough evidence at this point to draw a few firm conclusions. We’ll get to them in a second. But first,

The curious case of the complaining customers.

I’m about to tell you a story which I can only really describe as “freaking weird on the face of it”.

It is the story of how my customers complained about my prices for QLab 1. Specifically, how they complained that those prices were

Too low.

I spend some time paying attention to what people are saying about my product. I check the mailing lists. I check the forums. I check the Twitter. And what I found in the days of QLab 1 was that, mixed in with the astonishing news that some people were buying their first Mac ever just so they could use QLab, was the equally astonishing news that some people were unwilling to buy QLab at all because it didn’t cost enough.

Even weirder, I started getting emails from people who did buy it, asking me to raise the price.

Whaaaa?

That’s freaking weird.

I know, right?

But actually… it’s not. And here’s why: my customers knew themselves. They knew themselves much, much better than I did. I had started down this QLab road unsure there was any destination at the end of it. The first steps were for fun, the next steps were for fun and curiosity, and the next steps were for fun, curiosity, and maybe a little extra spending money on the side.

Yet, for my customers, it was more than that. I’d made something that people wanted to be part of their lives. They looked at my prices, and they knew: if this guy doesn’t raise his prices, he’s not going to be around long. They saw this problem clearly, and they saw it long before I did. So they told me.

And you know what? They were right. It took me a while, but eventually I realized they were right. Because at first, hey, I was actually doing pretty well for myself. I quit my job! I was working for myself! I was living the dream! I’d tell my wife at dinner the sales for the day and she’d look at me astonished and say “how many sound designers can there possibly be?” and I’d say, with a hint of hysterical terror in my voice, “I don’t know! Maybe that was the last one! Ha! HAHAHAHHAHAHOHGODOHGODPLEASELETMESELLANOTHERCOPY” But they kept coming! Eventually I managed to even view each sale not with terror, but merely with mild discomfort. Because they kept coming! Surely probability was on my side!

And yet… each sale also meant a new person in our community. New people in the community brought wonderful energy, wonderful stories, and lots of new questions, new requests, and new emails in my inbox every morning. I loved it! But I’m only one guy! And I was running a company that could only afford to be one guy!

And my customers knew it. And eventually, even I knew it. Which brings me to

What happened next.

Or

Probably the most anxious 9 months of my life to date.

Wow, was it really nine months? Let’s see, I quit my job in April, and I released QLab 2 the following January. Ha! Nice! Symbolism, that was a perfect place to step in. Thanks for that.

What did I do in that nine months? I rewrote my product, and I reexamined my company. Both needed adjustments. The product would become QLab 2. The company would become…what, exactly?

I said in my illustrated history of QLab that I was “literally shaking” when I pressed the send button on the email that announced QLab 2. It’s true; I was.

Whatever happened next was essentially going to determine the future of me and my company. Would people like the product? Would they be willing to support it at the new prices? (The audio license had increased in price by 500%! That’s not a little bump!) Would I be able to make a real company, that could support real employees for the real long term? It had been nine months of hundreds of hours of coding, testing, designing, tweaking, second-guessing, hair-pulling work. And all nine months of it came down to pressing that one button. You’d shake too.

Well, here’s what happened:

first-three.png

<insert stunned silence here>

A fluke? Turns out: no. Here’s the bigger picture:

gross-monthly-all-time.png

And here’s the breakdown by count, gross, and license type:

qlab-2-counts.png

qlab-2-gross.png

So. What to make of this? The graphs tell part of the story, but what was going on at the human level? Was I fielding outraged emails from customers that could no longer afford my product? Did I raise my profits by turning away large swaths of the community I’d worked so hard to find? When I actually did raise my prices, did everyone, in short, freak the hell out?

To my astonishment, the answer was

No.

Really. It really was.

People did not get angry. I can count on one hand the number of angry emails or Twitter messages I’ve seen about QLab’s price. And for each of those angry messages? I reached out. We talked. I listened to what was making them angry, and we talked about it. And not one of those people are angry anymore.

People did not get turned away. I know of a single customer that turned away because of the price. One. And while maybe there are people who turned away and didn’t tell me, I will remind you that we are selling more licenses. And those licenses are being sold, as far as I can tell, to the same kinds of people as before. How? How could I possibly raise my prices by 500% and not turn people away? Because, remember, I didn’t just raise our prices. I rebuilt our entire pricing structure. I still had the free version. It was still really powerful. I added the rentals. They’re even more powerful, but they’re also really cheap for the situations where it’s most justifiable that QLab should be really cheap. And I added the educational discounts on everything. And, at the end of the day, there was me, a human being who cares and who really wants people to use my software. If someone reaches out to me, we talk. We figure something out. And only once did it get that far and reach an impasse.

In short: I fixed my broken prices, and everyone won.

Or, to put it a different way: Pricing is a single variable in a multiverse of important variables. In this complicated universe of ours, it’s rare that myopically optimizing one variable does the universe any good.

Or, to put it a third way: Pricing reminds us that

There is. No. Spoon.

There’s this single moment in time when money changes hands for a product or service. That’s an unusual moment, because at that moment the product, in some sense, has a real, definable “price”. But before and after that moment the value of whatever is being purchased is a probabilistic blur where reality, emotion, and psychology mix in strange ways.

Each person who buys your software, your theater ticket, your whatever, will assign their own value to the thing. In a perfect world you would charge each person exactly how much they value your software, your theater ticket, or your whatever. But you can’t do that — not just because it will be different for different people but because it will even be different for the same people, depending on when and how you ask them.

By setting a price, you are basically taking a stab or three into a probabilistic soup. We all know there’s no cosmic ledger of “correct” prices. We all know we’re taking a stab. But what we don’t always fully consider — or, at least, what I didn’t fully consider — is how deeply

Psychology trumps.

There is disturbing anecdotal evidence of this in the form of people who spend money they don’t have. But the best evidence I have from personal experience can be summed up in two words: Educational. Discount.

Recall that above I told you the initial price of a QLab audio license was 49 dollars. That was the flat rate. That was the take-it-or-leave-it. That was the here’s-the-best-I-can-do.

And you know wanna know something? You wanna know what question I fielded most often? Any guesses? It was:

“Do you have an educational discount?”

On a 49 dollar license! For a piece of software that, it may also interest you to know, was offering a genuine and viable alternative to a product that, at the time, cost around — wait for it! — 1000 bucks!

Now fast forward to version 2. The price of the audio license has gone from 49 dollars to 249 dollars. But, knowing my most common question about version 1, I also add an educational price: 199 dollars. Or, to put it another way, the new discounted price is 400% greater than the old standard price.

And now? Now we sell more of these than we ever did with the standard price of version 1! Does the new rental license have something to do with this? Probably. It certainly gives a fantastic alternate discount for those who have an exceptionally tight budget.

But I’m telling you that I used to get the “educational discount” question on almost every single license I sold to an educational institution. Now, I have an educational discount, and it’s 400% more expensive than the old non-discounted version, and I have never once received a request for an additional discount!

Psychology is weird!

But also: important to respect!

Alright, let’s bring this home.

Here’s my thing.

You care about your customer. You’re on their team, and they are also on your team. That’s an important relationship. My goal here is not to abuse or break that relationship, but if anything to strengthen it. The right price is the one that’s fair to both of you, and if you’re genuinely on each others’ team, you can stand up for this fact without shame or greed.

When you’re starting out, you try to guess how your customers will value what you do. You’re probably going to be wrong, and you’re probably going to guess low. Because you’re a nice person. You want to make your work “accessible”.

Now, in my experience, there is such a thing as accessibility, but it has a bad psychological influence on you when you’re setting your base price. It skews you low. You’re new at this, you’re not sure what you do is worth money, you’re thinking of all those hypothetical customers who can’t afford more than X dollars for your product, whatever. Point is, here you are, you’ve just started out, you have no data, and you’re a nice person, so you tried to be fair, and accessible, and your price is really low.

Now, shooting low isn’t automatically a terrible way to start. You can always change your price, and it’s not so bad to come out of the gate humble instead of cocky. So the problem isn’t so much where you start, as it is,

What you do next

This is the tricky part, and this is the part I see my fellow young people flubbing.

You essentially have one data point. “This is what happens when I value my work at price X.” Maybe it even works okay. You’re selling a bunch of tickets at 15 bucks a pop. Sure, you’re living on egg noodles, but you’ve got young people coming to see your shows that couldn’t otherwise afford it. Well, maybe. You probably don’t actually have hard data to confirm that, but you’re pretty sure it’s true.

But what if it’s not?

Consider QLab for a second. Lucky for me, I wasn’t just a little ignorant about pricing, I was a lot ignorant. I priced my work so extremely low that my own customers knew I’d overdone it. I’m blessed with smart, professional customers, and they knew my market (i.e. themselves) way better than I did. They knew that in the long run I couldn’t survive on the prices I’d picked. They wanted me to survive. So they warned me: “Your prices are too low. You need to charge me more.”

You’re probably not as dumb as me.

So back to you, and your 15 dollar ticket. Or your 40 dollar piece of shareware. Whatever. The point is, you’re probably not as dumb as me. When you stabbed into the probabilistic soup of prices, you may have aimed better, and gotten a better number up front. If so, that may be a problem, because the warning signs may be less obvious. Maybe your patron thinks to themselves “huh, 15 bucks, that’s a really great price”. And silently enjoys your show. For 10 bucks less than their internal value-ometer was inclined to suggest.

And now, week by week, month by month, where does that extra 10 dollars go? Well, if you never needed it in the first place, good on you; you’re not greedy. A little odd that you’re willing to value yourself less than your customers, but that’s your prerogative.

But if you DO need that extra 10 dollars, then the common wisdom is that it’s going to come out of your budget. Sure, that’s probably true. That’s probably partly where it comes from. But I suspect that maybe only 7 bucks of that really actually comes out of your budget.

I suspect that the rest of it probably comes bleeding out of you.

And that’s a problem.

And, tragically, it may not even need to be a problem. And you don’t even know it.

You’re worth it.

You’re on the same team as your customer. You know that. They know that.

By all means, make your work accessible. But be careful about what you think that means, and how you choose to do it.

Your customer thinks you’re worth it. For the sake of you both, act like you are.

22 Comments

  1. Michael
    Posted June 9, 2010 at 12:12 pm | Permalink

    I’ve often wondered why there aren’t more reverse auctions among theaters to sell of, at the very least, excess capacity. All that is really missing is a market maker, the role of which could be filled by (for example) a TKTS or League of Chicago Theatres. These organizations already provide straight discounts, and high-interest consumers are already accustomed to purchasing tickets at a discount from them. If price were really the deciding factor for a customer (“I won’t attend unless the price is below $X.”), a reverse auction would easily connect those customers with theatres that meet their price criteria. This is a win-win, because if the seat is otherwise empty, the theatre would rather get $1 for it than $0. Additionally, for productions with high ticketing demand, theatres could more easily price discriminate in order to satisfy demand while charging the actual perceived value of the ticket (which would be more than the list price, given scarcity). A straightforward explanation of reverse auctions is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_auction

  2. Posted June 9, 2010 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Chris, this was extremely informative!

    I love your product, and keep trying to get my theatre to swap over to QLab….so far I am running the free version whenever we only need a couple channels of playback.

    I really appreciate you having the free version, and the “everything works” demo version. Please keep it around!

    I also think you should add a lighting side!!!!! Just think, using an enttec USB to DMX adapter and like 48 channels of control, you could easily control any small theater out there!

    Keep up the GREAT work!

    :)

  3. Posted June 9, 2010 at 1:26 pm | Permalink

    I had no idea my offhanded Tweet would net this amazing post, but I sure am glad. Thanks Chris!

  4. Dan
    Posted June 9, 2010 at 3:08 pm | Permalink

    Hey, I would have paid 3 bucks for those insights!

  5. Sean
    Posted June 9, 2010 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    I’m thinking that perhaps this could be a secondary benefit to dynamic pricing: it gives you more than one data point per show, and lets you test out higher prices with less risk. Try selling the first 2/3 of your seats for $15 and the rest for $25. That gives you two data points. Are the $25 tickets still selling like hotcakes? Then recalibrate. For the next event, sell 2/3 of your tickets at $25 and the rest at $35. If the $35 tickets aren’t doing terribly well, maybe $30 is optimal. Or something like that.

    Also, funny you should have picked the exact numbers you did; I just bought a pair of $15 tickets to a small indie theater — for $10 less than my internal value-ometer was inclined to suggest. :)

  6. Posted June 9, 2010 at 5:22 pm | Permalink

    I love this… I had a student comment to me once they they couldn’t grasp how they could charge anyone for the privilege of working in live theatre. We talked it through and he came to the realization that while that’s noble and all, it’s not going to allow him the support to become the artist he can be instead of someone who works in theatre ‘on the side’ while he’s asking if you wanted whip on your mocha. Yes, we’re in this business because we love it, but we need to remember that we only grow when we have to resources to do so.

  7. Posted June 9, 2010 at 5:22 pm | Permalink

    Chris,

    I love EVERYTHING about this post. I love the way you demonstrated with core data the process you went through and the outcome. Its fantastic.

    I couldn’t agree more, and I’m going to be forwarding this to everyone I know.

    Thank you.

    Trisha

  8. Posted June 9, 2010 at 5:35 pm | Permalink

    Very nice post, thank you. Another factor I believe, especially in the software world, is that some (most?) people view pricing in an almost binary fashion: For a medium scale consumer app the price can be free, acceptable (say $10-80) and then too much. The fact is, someone that is ready to make the jump and give you money won’t care if it’s $20 or $40 I think. And those that just want freeware, well, you can’t reach them anyway so why bother with them.

  9. Keith
    Posted June 9, 2010 at 6:52 pm | Permalink

    I’ve heard some interesting things about take-up when people included a “if you can’t afford this price, drop me an email and we’ll come to some arrangement” type of rider to their pricing structure. Very few uses, and generally provably real when they did happen (NGOs on restricted budgets, high school students, etc). But other customers appreciated it.

    I also remember in the House of Terror Museum in Budapest (which details the Nazi & Soviet occupations) seeing a sign that said (in English) something very close to: “You’re a tourist. We’re charging you a bit more so that we can bring Hungarian school children here for free. We believe they need to learn what happened. We hope you agree.” Plenty of tourists (including me) threw an extra few florins in the donation box on top of our ticket price.

  10. Posted June 9, 2010 at 8:52 pm | Permalink

    I love what you’re saying. But I’ve got to ask, how many other developers out there were you competing with when you set up your pricing structure?

    Can we really apply the thinking when there are 200+ theatre companies in Chicago alone vying for everyone’s attention? Or is that all the more reason to do so?

    If we’re all scraggling around $15-$20, trying to price it so our friends can see the show, then a few theaters start adjusting with this method, perhaps they’ll benefit with a perceived value shift by comparison.

  11. Posted June 10, 2010 at 3:54 am | Permalink

    Hi Chris,
    you are a copywriting master! I love the end-of-sentence-titles!
    The insights on QLab’s pricing experience are the most valuable story about a first-time self-made entrepreneur struggling with pricing.
    I am close to be at the same point sometime soon and getting the price right seems to be one of the most public facing aspects of the business. I’d say it feels like pricing is more important than the app itself.
    Thanks again for getting me thinking,
    Francesco

  12. Posted June 10, 2010 at 8:34 am | Permalink

    I ran across this totally randomly and I have to say it’s a really good piece.

  13. Posted June 10, 2010 at 9:51 am | Permalink

    Excellent post!

    I translated an incredible summary for my students’ pricing class.

    There’s this single moment in time when money changes hands for a product or service. That’s an unusual moment, because at that moment the product, in some sense, has a real, definable “price”. But before and after that moment the value of whatever is being purchased is a probabilistic blur where reality, emotion, and psychology mix in strange ways.

    (in Spanish).

    “Existe un momento único en la situación en que el dinero cambia de manos por un producto o servicio. Es raro, porque en este momento el producto, en cierto sentido, tiene un valor real, definido por el “precio”. Pero antes y después de este momento el valor de lo que se está comprando es una definición probabilística donde la realidad, la emoción y la psicología se mezclan de manera extraña.”

  14. Posted June 10, 2010 at 11:13 am | Permalink

    @Michelle: I think having lots of competition is probably a great reason to increase your price. It differentiates you — you’re the company making theater that’s worth twice as much as everyone else.

    And in terms of “pricing it so friends can see the shows” — again, this is really the key point: increasing your prices does not mean preventing people from seeing your shows. For me, that’s the take-home message. You can (and should!) make sure everyone who wants to see your show can still see it.

    Let’s take the 15 dollar ticket again. Let’s say you raised your prices to 30 dollars, but you know someone who wants to see your show who genuinely can’t afford more than 15 bucks. Well, find a way to sell it to them for 15 bucks! Instead of getting a full-price 15 dollar ticket, they just got a 30 dollar ticket for 15 bucks! How good does that feel? And you get the same amount of money either way. And someone else, who can easily afford the 30 dollar ticket buys it and doesn’t think twice about it, and they have a great experience too. And now you’ve not only got more money, but the sum-total emotional experience is actually better than it was if you’d just set all tickets at 15 bucks.

    Competing on price is a valid thing to do. But in my opinion it’s one of the last things to do, not one of the first. If your pricing structure is set up such that you are essentially competing on price on every single ticket sold, you are almost certainly pulling that particular lever way too often.

    @Francesco Thank you! I am thrilled that you enjoyed it. I would disagree that price is more important than the app itself, though. It is certainly important, but you have to make something worth buying before you can give it a price that reflects that fact. :)

  15. Posted June 13, 2010 at 6:24 pm | Permalink

    Great post Chris! Thanks for taking the time to write it.

  16. Posted June 20, 2010 at 12:00 pm | Permalink

    Sorry I’m so late to the party here, finally just got a chance to read this great article!

    The psychological concept with the educational discount is called anchoring, this is what steve jobs did with the iPad when he said “Some industry analyists say we should sell this for under $1000, which means $999,” and then left $999 up on the board for a long, long time. Then, when he announced it was going to be $499 (as the $499 dramatically fell from the heavens and crushed the $999), everyone said, my goodness, how can we get so much for so little?

    Walmart does the same thing, as does everyone that ever runs a sale, ever. You establish the ‘full price’ value of the item, make sure this value is anchored in your customers mind, then you discount it (probably to 400%-500% above cost), and they love you to death for it.

    I digress.

    My question is, do you think you would have been as successful had you started out with higher prices? You alluded to it a bit, but specifically, you started low and got a lot of traction and feedback, basically invaluable things for a startup. If you would have been a bit more expensive, would that have stopped the early adopters from adopting as early? Would it have slowed them?

    I realize hindsight is 20/20, however, it seems to me this is a great model, build a great product, get it out there for cheap (NOT FREE), and then get the feedback you really need at that early stage, and a few bucks too. Like you said, the more egregiously incorrect the pricing is, the more you’ll hear about, and will ultimately get to the correct price more quickly. Being respectful of anchoring, it’s probably for the best to keep the price low and inflate, then be overpriced and have to discount.

    -B

  17. Posted June 23, 2010 at 1:31 am | Permalink

    Hi. Really nice article.
    I was just wondering whether pricing to end users (B2C) (like the example you give) is different from pricing to businesses (B2B). Does the same psychology apply here?
    Thanks!

  18. Posted June 23, 2010 at 6:50 am | Permalink

    @Brian That’s a great question (“shoot high or low?”), and I don’t know the answer. My inclination is that your take on it is correct, if only because I have a gut feeling that you don’t want to make a first impression of being “those arrogant S.O.B.s that thought their stuff was worth twice as much as it is.” Once you’ve established a track record of actually caring about your customer, it seems like that’s a better position from which to push toward more fair pricing.

    @Oliver For what it’s worth, I sell to both end users and businesses. I don’t think that gives you a definitive answer, but FWIW.

  19. Posted June 23, 2010 at 8:51 am | Permalink

    I’d note that once you have launched your pricing scheme it’s far more easier to decrease prices than increase them, in terms of popularity and acceptance of the change.

  20. Posted June 23, 2010 at 9:00 am | Permalink

    @Francesco I guess it depends on how you do it. As I mentioned in my story, we had no difficulty increasing prices, although I did take care to not JUST increase prices. (By adding the inexpensive rental licenses.)

  21. Posted June 23, 2010 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    @Chris: of course you are a living example the opposite is also true. I had subscription based sites in mind when I wrote the comments. Single license purchases are definitely another world apart!

  22. Posted August 2, 2010 at 4:48 pm | Permalink

    Hi Chris,

    I cannot tell you how helpful this article was for me. What a gift – thank you for sharing your story.

    You are absolutely right – I’ve undercharged for my services and it gets sucked out of me. Then I have nothing left to give – nothing left for the work that can greatly help others. Then I want to give up because it’s too hard.

    And you’re also right – in my case – that it’s fear that keeps me from charging more.

    Now I’m going to have a good honest look at my pricing – and how I can build a viable business, offer viable services, and serve my customers while also honoring myself.

    Best, Karly

12 Trackbacks

  1. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Chris Ashworth, Zach Waugh. Zach Waugh said: Great post on the psychology of pricing RT @Chris_Ashworth: New blog post: "My 2 Bucks on Pricing" http://j.mp/blTQsS [...]

  2. By My daily readings 06/10/2010 « Strange Kite on June 10, 2010 at 7:31 am

    [...] My 2 Bucks on Pricing – ChrisAshworth.org [...]

  3. By Link dump for June 10th | The Queue Blog on June 11, 2010 at 12:01 am

    [...] My 2 Bucks on Pricing – ChrisAshworth.org – A fascinating read on pricing covering, among other things, why pricing to low is bad for you _and_ your customers. [...]

  4. [...] meaningful article on Pricing.(Pricing) 2010-06-14 [...]

  5. By Personal Development Favorites For June 19, 2010 on June 19, 2010 at 12:57 pm

    [...] My 2 Bucks on Pricing by Chris Ashworth [...]

  6. [...] My 2 Bucks on Pricing [...]

  7. [...] Chris Ashworth on whether the pricing’s right We’ve talked a lot about price and value here, and most recently about dynamic pricing. Chris Ashworth, the man who brought the world QLab, shares the lessons he learned about how to price the software, and how the customer is always right. (And if you think the customer wanted it to be cheaper, you really need to read this post.) Chris also shares his competitive advantage: he hires artists. Wise man. [...]

  8. By Maybe We Need a New Mop | 24 Usable Hours on June 29, 2010 at 10:54 pm

    [...] of Pricing didn’t cover nearly as many interesting points of view as the many conversations here, and here, and of course here (although admittedly I had to leave after the first 1.5 hours). But [...]

  9. [...] My 2 Bucks on Pricing by Chris Ashworth [...]

  10. By Taking The ProBlogger 7 Post Challenge on July 26, 2010 at 8:07 pm

    [...] you wish you’d written – It has to be Chris Ashworth’s article on pricing called My 2 Bucks On Pricing. I came across it via Karol Gajda a month or two ago. Best damn article I’ve ever read on [...]

  11. [...] 当然,低估产品价值的最主要的原因是SaaS公司没有明确了解产品的潜力。客户是谁?他们为什么会关注?产品为他们提供了什么服务?或者更准确地说…  客户感知的价值是什么呢?这对我们有一些启示,在IT/基础设施以外,一般不是技术。正如其他低估产品价值的问题一样,如果一个公司的高级主管或启动创始人都是高技术性的,他们往往把重点放在技术性的东西上,因为他们不得不这样做,因为这是他们熟悉的。但同时他们会忘记什么对客户真正有价值。为了对这个问题有一个非常诚实的,真实的,源于实际经验的了解,我们一定要看看 Chris Ashworth的文章,题为“我对定价的看法” 。在这篇文章中,他介绍了对自己软件定价过低的问题,客户的反馈以及他提高价格后发生的事情。(顺便说一下,提价也伴随了主要功能的更新)。 [...]

  12. By On a Roll « The Powers of Observation on August 30, 2010 at 8:45 pm

    [...] Matt Gemmell (mattgemmell on Twitter) ChrisAshworth.org crude diagrams, indie best practices, and this sublime post on app pricing, by Chris Ashworth (Chris_Ashworth on Twitter) Alan Quatermain by Jim Dovey of Kobo [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*